Outcomes and Perioperative Risk Factors after Oncologic Free-Flap Scalp Reconstruction

Abstract

Background Little is known about the risk factors associated with complications after free flap scalp reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to identify patient, scalp defect, and flap characteristics associated with increased risk of surgical complications.

Methods A retrospective study was performed of free-flap scalp reconstruction in oncologic patients at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center from 2002 to 2017. Data collection included patient, defect, flap, and complication characteristics. Complications were classified into major, defined as complications requiring surgical intervention, and minor, defined as complications requiring conservative treatment. Risk factors and outcome variables were compared using chi-square with Fisher's exact test.

Results A total of 63 free flaps to the scalp in 58 patients were performed; average follow-up was 3.5 years. Most flaps were muscle-only or musculocutaneous. One-third of patients with free flaps experienced complications (n = 21, 15 major and 6 minor). Examining risk factors for complications, patients with cardiovascular disease were nearly three times more likely to have suffered a major complication than patients without cardiovascular disease (36.7 vs. 12.1%, p = 0.04). This was the only significant risk factor noted. Perioperative radiotherapy, prior scalp surgery, flap type, and recipient vessel selection were found to be nonsignificant risk factors.

Conclusion Cardiovascular disease may be a significant marker of risk for major complications in patients undergoing free-flap reconstruction of the scalp. This information should be used to help guide perioperative counseling and decision making in this challenging patient population.

Keywords

scalp reconstruction - free flap - perioperative risk - complications - cardiovascular disease

• References

• 1 Fischer JP, Sieber B, Nelson JA. et al. A 15-year experience of complex scalp reconstruction using free tissue transfer-analysis of risk factors for complications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (02) 89-97
• 2 Hussussian CJ, Reece GP. Microsurgical scalp reconstruction in the patient with cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (06) 1828-1834
• 3 Sweeny L, Eby B, Magnuson JS, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL. Reconstruction of scalp defects with the radial forearm free flap. Head Neck Oncol 2012; 4: 21
• 4 Othman S, Azoury SC, Tecce MG. et al. Free flap reconstruction of complex oncologic scalp defects in the setting of mesh cranioplasty: risk factors and outcomes. J Craniofac Surg 2020; 31 (04) 1107-1110
• 5 Chao AH, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Demonte F, Hanasono MM. Microsurgical reconstruction of composite scalp and calvarial defects in patients with cancer: a 10-year experience. Head Neck 2012; 34 (12) 1759-1764
• 6 Newman MI, Hanasono MM, Disa JJ, Cordeiro PG, Mehrara BJ. Scalp reconstruction: a 15-year experience. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 52 (05) 501-506 , discussion 506
• 7 Shah AM, Banerjee T, Mukherjee D. Coronary, peripheral and cerebrovascular disease: a complex relationship. Herz 2008; 33 (07) 475-480
• 8 Poredos P, Jug B. The prevalence of peripheral arterial disease in high risk subjects and coronary or cerebrovascular patients. Angiology 2007; 58 (03) 309-315
• 9 Dieter RS, Tomasson J, Gudjonsson T. et al. Lower extremity peripheral arterial disease in hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease. Vasc Med 2003; 8 (04) 233-236
• 10 Atmer B, Jogestrand T, Laska J, Lund F. Peripheral artery disease in patients with coronary artery disease. Int Angiol 1995; 14 (01) 89-93
• 11 Brennan PA. External carotid artery stenosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma–a prospective study. Oral Oncol 2008; 44 (03) 301-304
• 12 Lee MK, Blackwell KE, Kim B, Nabili V. Feasibility of microvascular head and neck reconstruction in the setting of calcified arteriosclerosis of the vascular pedicle. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2013; 15 (02) 135-140
• 13 Song P, Pu LLQ. Microsurgical scalp reconstruction: an overview of the contemporary approach. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (07) 530-538
• 14 Xu H, Jazayeri L, Matros E, Henderson PW. Anatomy, exposure, and preparation of recipient vessels in microsurgical head and neck reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 97-110
• 15 Kuri M, Nakagawa M, Tanaka H, Hasuo S, Kishi Y. Determination of the duration of preoperative smoking cessation to improve wound healing after head and neck surgery. Anesthesiology 2005; 102 (05) 892-896
• 16 Sørensen LT. Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg 2012; 147 (04) 373-383
• 17 Harrison B, Khansa I, Janis JE. Evidence-based strategies to reduce postoperative complications in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 137 (01) 351-360
• 18 Dortch JD, Eck DL, Ladlie B, TerKonda SP. Perioperative glycemic control in plastic surgery: review and discussion of an institutional protocol. Aesthet Surg J 2016; 36 (07) 821-830
• 19 Shestak KC, Jones NF. Microsurgical free-tissue transfer in the elderly patient. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (02) 259-263
• 20 Shestak KC, Jones NF, Wu W, Johnson JT, Myers EN. Effect of advanced age and medical disease on the outcome of microvascular reconstruction for head and neck defects. Head Neck 1992; 14 (01) 14-18
• 21 Tsai CH, Chang KP, Hung SY, Chen WF, Cheng MH, Kao HK. Postoperative morbidity in head and neck cancer ablative surgery followed by microsurgical free tissue transfer in the elderly. Oral Oncol 2012; 48 (09) 811-816
• 22 Turrà F, La Padula S, Razzano S. et al. Microvascular free-flap transfer for head and neck reconstruction in elderly patients. BMC Surg 2013; 13 (Suppl 2): S27
• 23 Wester JL, Lindau RH, Wax MK. Efficacy of free flap reconstruction of the head and neck in patients 90 years and older. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2013; 139 (01) 49-53
• 24 Simunovic F, Eisenhardt SU, Penna V, Thiele JR, Stark GB, Bannasch H. Microsurgical reconstruction of oncological scalp defects in the elderly. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (07) 912-919
• 25 Sosin M, Schultz BD, De La Cruz C. et al. Microsurgical scalp reconstruction in the elderly: a systematic review and pooled analysis of the current data. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 135 (03) 856-866
• 26 Labow BI, Rosen H, Pap SA, Upton J. Microsurgical reconstruction: a more conservative method of managing large scalp defects?. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (08) 465-474
• 27 Tecce MG, Othman S, Mauch JT. et al. Complex oncologic resection and reconstruction of the scalp: predictors of morbidity and mortality. Arch Craniofac Surg 2020; 21 (04) 229-236
• 28 Manson PN, Crawley WA, Hoopes JE. Frontal cranioplasty: risk factors and choice of cranial vault reconstructive material. Plast Reconstr Surg 1986; 77 (06) 888-904
• 29 Imanishi N, Nakajima H, Minabe T, Chang H, Aiso S. Venous drainage architecture of the temporal and parietal regions: anatomy of the superficial temporal artery and vein. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (07) 2197-2203
• 30 Turin SY, Walton RL, Dumanian GA, Hijjawi JB, LoGiudice JA, Alghoul M. Current practices in the management of postoperative arterial vasospasm in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (04) 242-249
• 31 Hansen SL, Foster RD, Dosanjh AS, Mathes SJ, Hoffman WY, Leon P. Superficial temporal artery and vein as recipient vessels for facial and scalp microsurgical reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (07) 1879-1884
• 32 Halvorson EG, Cordeiro PG, Disa JJ, Wallin EF, Mehrara BJ. Superficial temporal recipient vessels in microvascular orbit and scalp reconstruction of oncologic defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2009; 25 (06) 383-387